Madelief Hageman vs Abigayel Vosloo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 06:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Hageman vs A. Vosloo

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hageman 1 - 0 Vosloo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Madelief Hageman winning 2 and Abigayel Vosloo winning 0. The last match between Madelief Hageman and Abigayel Vosloo was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hageman | 1 |
| Vosloo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Sharm ElSheikh(10-01-25)
M. Hageman vs A. Vosloo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.18% (138-137) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (6-12) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Hageman vs A. Vosloo Match Preview:
- How do the players perform on their second serve? Abigayel Vosloo has a slight edge, winning 40.00% of second serve points compared to Madelief Hageman's 38.34% over the last six months.
- In terms of return game, Madelief shows stronger performance by winning 49.23% of second serve return points versus Vosloo's 42.59%. However, Vosloo edges out slightly on first serve returns with 39.36% over Hageman's 38.45%.
- When it comes to handling pressure, specifically in saving breakpoints, Hageman has been more effective, saving 47.52% compared to Vosloo’s 44.12%.
- Over the past year, Hageman has demonstrated better overall match success, claiming victory in 50.82% of her matches, whereas Vosloo has won 41.67% of her encounters.
- Is surface preference a factor? Interestingly, both players have similar win percentages of 40% on their best surfaces; Vosloo on Hard, and Hageman on Clay.
- Both athletes frequently compete in lower-tier tournaments, with Hageman displaying a marginally better win rate of 48.00% at the $10K level than Vosloo's 45.45%.
- Despite the slight difference, both players have faced opponents with similar average rankings—Hageman's opponents rank at 337.25 on average versus Vosloo’s at 340.75.
- For decisive set scenarios, Vosloo exhibits impressive resilience, winning 75% of deciding sets, compared to Hageman’s 43%.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match approaches, the stats offer intriguing insights into the potential outcome. Abigayel Vosloo and Madelief Hageman bring their own strengths to the table, with the former showing strong resilience in deciding sets and the latter demonstrating a solid return game.
Vosloo's ability to maintain a slight edge on second serve performance and her superior performance in deciding sets could be significant factors if the match remains tight. On the other hand, Madelief Hageman's adeptness at winning return points and her higher overall match win rate over the past year suggests she possesses the necessary blend of consistency and skill to prevail.
However, given Vosloo's impressive performance under pressure, notably in deciding sets, she is likely to have a psychological advantage in critical moments. In a match that might extend to a deciding set, Vosloo's resilience may well play a crucial role.
Considering the combination of stats and recent trends, Abigayel Vosloo is slightly favored to win the upcoming match, but expect a closely contested encounter.
Madelief Hageman vs Abigayel Vosloo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Hageman vs A. Vosloo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:2:11 | Average Match Time | 1:2:11 |
| 65% (28/43) | 1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) |
| 79% (22/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (7/20) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 57% (30/53) | Return Points Win % | 28% (12/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Hageman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
A. Vosloo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 4-6 10-5 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||

M. Hageman vs A. Vosloo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.18% (138/137) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 49.61% (314/319) | Sets Win/Loss | 30.77% (12/27) |
| 51.22% (3005/2862) | Games Win/Loss | 40.34% (144/213) |
| 40.54% (15/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 51.74% (119/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 190 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 561 | Total Double Faults | 46 |
| 1:20:23 | Average Match Time | 1:9:9 |
| 340.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 355.61 |
| 65% (8830/13560) | 1st Serve % | 64% (485/753) |
| 57% (5021/8830) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (257/485) |
| 44% (2077/4730) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (116/268) |
| 49% (870/1772) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (36/88) |
| 47% (6328/13377) | Return Points Win % | 43% (328/766) |
| 38.10% (16/26) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 52.36% (122/111) | Futures W/L | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 50% (137/274) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 20% (9/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (45/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 85% (135/115) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (5/5) |
| 15% (135/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (5/0) |
| 16% (140/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (13/1) |